Cookie compensation demands
A quick buck for non-compliance?
What’s darkening our e-doormat this morning? It’s not a letter from the Information Commissioner’s Office.
It’s not ransomware or a phishing attempt.
No… it’s the dreaded cookie compensation demand!
Increasingly my colleagues and I, and friends in the data protection space, hear reports of official looking, legally-laden letters being received by companies. The simple message; your cookies are non-compliant, this is distressing me and I want money from you.
And everyone’s a potential target – any size of business, any sector. We know of small agencies through to blue chips receiving these letters. They aren’t complaining to a regulator, they‘re coming straight to your front door or in-box.
Unlike the well-known privacy group noyb, who threaten to raise a formal complaint with a regulator if the offending company doesn’t remedy violations within a specified time, these demands from individuals would appear to have the sole aim of earning a quick buck.
For me, such letters leave a nasty taste, especially when smaller businesses or not-for-profits are targeted and where cookie use is limited.
How do they know our cookies aren’t compliant?
It’s easy to find out what cookies are used by any website. There are a number of free tools which you can just pop a website domain name into, and hey presto! A scan is run, and the results returned, revealing any cookie sins you may have committed.
What’s the claim?
Generally the claim letters allege non-essential cookies are being dropped onto users’ devices automatically, without clear information about their purposes and without consent. If a cookie banner is present, the claim will be it’s not compliant with UK GDPR / Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR).
The letters often assume personal data is captured by the cookies – which may or may not be true. However, remember the PECR rules apply to cookies and similar tech regardless of whether the data they collect is personal or not.
The letters will claim distress or damage has been caused as a result of the placement of cookies onto the user’s device. It’s worth noting the right to compensation isn’t automatic; the claimant must be able to prove ‘damage or distress.’
As for how much – this isn’t nearly as scary as the realms of ransomware, with typical compensation demands in the region of £500-£1000.
To pay, or not to pay?
Companies are of course taking different approaches. In our experience many are ignoring them, and never hear from the complainant ever again. Others are standing their ground and asking for evidence of distress or damage. While some take a look at their cookies and similar tech and think, okay, fair cop we aren’t compliant so we’ll pay.
If you pay out, do you need to quickly get your cookie house in order? There’s the risk if you don’t, they could be back in a few months’ time if you’ve not successfully resolved any issues.
What are the cookie rules?
Before we blame GDPR, the rules for cookies and similar technologies are in the UK set out in PECR. Other countries across Europe have similar (but not identical) rules derived from the European ePrivacy Directive.
In short, we need to provide meaningful information to people about the categories of cookies and similar tech we use, and gain consent for any cookies which are not strictly necessary.
Different regulators across Europe have taken slightly differing approaches to what would be considered strictly necessary. Here in the UK, for example website statistical cookies are not considered strictly necessary. (This could potentially change under government plans to reform data laws; you can read more about this here). However the French regulator, CNIL, for example, accepts statistical cookies as strictly necessary.
When GDPR came into effect in 2018, consent needed to meet a higher standard. The days of implied consent were over. This is why we’re greeted by a barrage of cookie banners and notices wherever we go online.
The reason these compensation demands are possible is under PECR, people who have suffered damage or distress as a result of a contravention of the rules are entitled to bring proceedings against the offending party and seek compensation for that damage. Similarly under GDPR people have the right to receive compensation where they’ve suffered material or non-material damage due to an infringement of the law.
What can we do to protect ourselves?
The only way to completely avoid a cookie compensation demand is to understand what types of cookies and similar tech are used by our website(s), behave transparently with a clear notification and collect informed consent for any which aren’t strictly necessary. The ICO Cookie Guidance illustrates what type of cookies might be considered strictly necessary.
There are lots of cookie consent management platforms on the market, some of which are free. However, if your cookie use is quite sophisticated, or you have sub-domains, a free option might not be enough.
Alternatively the options are to ignore, stand your ground or pay out.
I’ve heard a little rumour, one of the posse of cookie claimants is an in-house DPO who does this as a side hustle. And if you ask me, it’s just not cricket.